DSpace Repository

Measuring Literacy Outcomes for the Blind and for the Deaf: Nationally Representative Results From Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pipera, Benjamin
dc.contributor.author Bulatb, Jennae
dc.contributor.author Kwayumbaa, Dunston
dc.contributor.author Oketcha, John
dc.contributor.author Ganglac, Lilian
dc.date.accessioned 2020-06-02T07:00:11Z
dc.date.available 2020-06-02T07:00:11Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation B. Piper, et al.International Journal of Educational Development 69 (2019) 1–82 en_US
dc.identifier.uri eader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0738059318309635?token=C5E747809CAEB2E337CFE5F76E0D5C72AA5C71852B2A2F56B044F25FE1C384BD36D4CE44EA3CA11122872AADEE83630E
dc.identifier.uri http://kerd.ku.ac.ke/123456789/778
dc.description An Article Published in International Journal of Educational Development en_US
dc.description.abstract Evidence is scarce as to the literacy skills of children with special needs in low- and middle-income countries. Utilizing nationally representative data from Kenya, we present literacy outcomes for the blind and for the deaf in English, and for the blind in Kiswahili in Grade 1 and 2. Although comparisons with children in “regular” classrooms would be inappropriate due to language differences, we used large-scale data available from non-special-needs Kenyan classrooms to investigate the distribution of literacy skills. We found that children served by special schools for the blind outperformed those who were attending special units within “regular” schools, across nearly all estimates of literacy. For the deaf, no meaningful differences emerged in performance scores between children attending special schools and special units. Further, language preferences for the deaf population varied broadly; future research should consider assessing skills in Kenya Sign Language as well as Signed Exact English. Given the low literacy skills of both the blind and the deaf populations, we recommend substantial investment in programs designed to improve literacy outcomes for these populations. We also recommend examining literacy skills among all special-needs learners at scale, because of the complexity countries find in supporting these diverse learners, and because only looking at a handful of schools can mask trends in low performance that would become more obvious at en_US
dc.description.sponsorship United States Agency for International Development (USAID) en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Journal of Educational Development en_US
dc.subject Measuring en_US
dc.subject Literacy Outcomes en_US
dc.subject Blind en_US
dc.subject Deaf en_US
dc.subject Nationally Representative en_US
dc.subject Kenya en_US
dc.title Measuring Literacy Outcomes for the Blind and for the Deaf: Nationally Representative Results From Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account